Dicky can't handle the negative criticism.
It appears that Dicky is upset that, unlike him, ""The Committee To Protect Bloggers" does not practice censorship when a comment might fall outside their point of view.
Dicky has been accused of, you got it, lying about another person to the point that it is libel. A libel case filed by Rachel Neuwirth goes to trial and Dicky appears to be very worried.
The Committee To Protect Bloggers voiced their support in that no matter how vile Dicky is personally, and no matter how he acts towards others on his blog, his right to spew nonsense should be protected. Dicky was so grateful for this support that he had a huge link on his blog. However, to his dismay, the criticism was so great that he removed the link.
Here is a sample of what drove Dicky to another act of cowardice:
Sharon
March 29, 2011 at 8:01 am
Dickie Silverstein has repeated tried to protect himself from his victims using anti-SLAPP laws. But he was the first peson in the Jewish cybersphere to endorse the fascist SLAPP suit filed by anti-Semite Neve Gordon in Israel against another professor that Silverstein regularly smears. So does he favor SLAPP suits or oppose them?
walt kovacs
May 5, 2011 at 1:22 am
hey alice….dickie didnt get one thing right in the sisi case
so what public service is he performing?
gag orders are not meant to be permanent…so all dickie does is leak the info prematurely…and is usually wrong, as he does a lot of assuming
he doesnt do anything positive for israel…as nothing would please him more to see the destruction of that country, and the murder of all her people
would you like to explain to me how on one hand, he can say he stands for women’s rights…then goes out of his way to smear a female border police officer…who is already under indictment?
No comments:
Post a Comment